Washington
DC
I recently visited the Michigan State medical school
to lecture about the “Spirituality of Weakness and Vulnerability.” I’ve lectured many times to medical students,
but this was a new topic for me and I was quite anxious: It’s not easy to write
about human vulnerability; we don’t have good language for it. Because of the long train/bus trip, I came in
a day early to be able to rest. I also
needed to tweak the lecture I’d prepared.
First panic: I discovered that my talk was on the
wrong subject … at least different from what I had told the organizer. This was actually the second time I’d
forgotten the subject matter. The
general topic was “Spirituality and Medicine.” I’d been asked last summer when
both the organizer and I believed I had Alzheimer’s, so I was going to talk
about that. In January, after I’d
discovered I didn’t have Alzheimer’s but only a stable cognitive decline, we
decided I would talk about my history of working as a physician in economically
oppressed areas and its impact on my spiritual life.
I wrote back with a proposed outline of my talk. He responded that he didn’t see any reference
to spirituality in the text. Sure
enough, I’d completely forgotten the general spirituality theme. So we settled on the “Spirituality of Doing,”
ie the deepening of my spirituality that had come from my work as a physician
in Washington DC. When it came time to
write the lecture, however, I forgot what I’d told him and prepared the lecture
on vulnerability.
Second panic: Re-reading the lecture, I realized it
was terrible: Simplistic, full of platitudes, and boring with no new,
interesting perspective. It was a ghost
of what I thought I’d written. I hadn’t
articulated what I knew in my spirit: integrating my human brokenness into my
spirituality was essential to being a good doctor. So I tried to fix it.
Third panic: About 6 PM I realized I wasn’t improving
the lecture, which comprised four stories describing different sides of
weakness and spirituality. But I
couldn’t tie them together … especially the story about my “Alzheimer’s,” which—while
still about weakness—had not been painful like the others.
Fourth panic: I choked. My anticipation of the next day’s
embarrassment and disappointment overwhelmed me emotionally. I could hardly think straight. I wasn’t going to be able to do this.
I took a long walk and returned to the hotel, hoping
to continue writing. Still nothing! In desperation I called Marja. She’d read the draft before I had left DC and
said, without much enthusiasm, that it was ok.
I wasn’t terribly hopeful she was going to be able to help now.
Story, story, story! she reminded me. It’s the stories that people remember, not
all the philosophy/psychology explaining it.
From my previous writing, I knew this to be true, but in this case I
just didn’t trust my naked stories.
Marja recommended letting the stories speak for themselves, hosever, without
trying to talk about them too much.
I felt a glimmer of hope and went back to
writing. It took me until 4 AM to get it
done. I got up at eight to make sure my
middle-of-the-night thinking was still coherent, made some small changes and
was picked up a little later. The
organizer wasn’t really upset about the subject change … what could he do,
after all?
I was still more anxious than I'd ever been before
giving a lecture, but the approximately 100 students and faculty paid close
attention …even though it was after lunch.
I can always tell when my audience is with me. They asked lots of good questions, and the
organizer and his group were very appreciative.
It was a wonderful experience for me.
(You can read the lecture here.)
Sharing stories of my brokenness gave people in the
audience permission to look at that broken part of themselves, to recognize
their dark sides, to acknowledge that they aren’t always the strong, confident
people they show the world. Recognizing our
weak and vulnerable sides can bring us closer to our true selves and to our
core values.
Only later did I understand that the whole process—forgetting
the agreed-upon lecture subjects, not recognizing the unsatisfying lecture
until almost too late, all the panics, and, in the end, acknowledging my
dependence on Marja—was itself an experience of my weakness and vulnerability.
There’s a brief sentence in the New Testament: “Be ye
perfect as your Father is perfect.” The
word translated into English as “perfect,” however, doesn’t mean doing
everything right; it means being whole, living out of one’s complete self,
expressing one’s deepest values. And in
each one of us being whole includes being aware of and acknowledging our weakness
and vulnerability.